温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.a1qa.com/blog/making-test-automation-a-reality-part-1
点击访问原文链接

Making test automation a reality: part I

进入原网站 导航首页
Making test automation a reality: part I Services Back Full-cycle testing services QA consulting Software lifecycle QA Ad-hoc testing Test automation Pre-certification testing User acceptance testing Crowdsourced testing Documentation services QA for digital transformation Engagement models Team augmentation Dedicated QA teams Managed testing services Fixed-price QA projects Quality engineering Shift-left testing Continuous testing Testing in Agile Multi-vendor environment Complete test coverage Functional testing Performance testing Cybersecurity testing Accessibility testing Compatibility testing Embedded testing Integration testing Localization testing Microservices testing Migration testing Regression testing Usability testing Systems & platforms Web apps Mobile apps Blockchain CRM ERP AR/VR Cloud Internet of things Medical devices Desktop Big data Salesforce SaaS AWS Azure Industries Back Software development Banking and financial services Telecommunications Media and entertainment Travel and hospitality eCommerce Insurance Healthcare Gaming Education Blog 25 April 2025 Building a safety net for banks: the role of testing in the ISO 20022 shift Approach Back How we work Testing environment Industry expertise Process maturity QA outsourcing ...With fast response to our requirements and professional approach, I can definitely recommend the cooperation with a1qa. Rainar Ütt, Head of Quality, InnoGames Portfolio Blog Company Back About us Clients QA Academy Awards News Values Events Contact us Case study a1qa helps roll out multi-regional mobile solutions for a leader in financial technology Contact us Blog Making test automation a reality: part 1 We talk about our experience in test automation moving from the discussion of its goals to advantages and disadvantages keeping in mind manual checks and automated testing debate. 5 July 2019 Test automation Home Blog Making test automation a reality: part 1 Test automation basics Striking a balance What to automate and where to go the “manual” route? Clear and visible intent of test automation Article by a1qa a1qa Within the last 15 years, the role of test automation and its purposes in IT have significantly extended. From focusing on shortening testing times, now it strives to reach better coverage and more effective usage of test cases.

This can be narrowed to one concept – the so-called “quality at speed.”

Although, the level of adopting test automation is extremely low: in conformity with the World Quality Report, 61% of the interviewed IT specialists emphasized they have faced difficulties automating their QA activities.

The reason is clear – the applications modify too often and too much with every release. Notwithstanding, this proves their endeavor to build a robust and smoothly working software test automation product.

This is basically pure truth. In this article, we will define whether test automation is a “silver bullet” for IT business or not.

Test automation basics As time goes by, test automation is focused on becoming smarter and more effective, as the confluence of AI, ML, analytics provides the systematic change in the benefits it can deliver.

To achieve valuable results of the projects, companies should consider that automated testing is not about replacing manual testing or getting a supplementary reduction in costs. In the most general sense, it is aimed to deliver quality at speed, take QA to the upper level, and make DevOps and Agile provide greater results.

Broadly speaking, we can divide test automation goals into 3 items:

Process-specific goals (faster time to market)High-level goals (LTV – lifetime value)Revenue-based goals (costs). When considering the targets more thoroughly, we’ll say it helps achieve the following local SDLC values:

The problem to get the utmost of test automation lies not only in implementing the service but also in adopting it successfully. To build the process properly, one has to delineate when to automate and when it won’t work out.

To automate might be a good decision whenThe software testing should not be automated ifSaving time is your top priorityTests require human intelligence and intuitionYour project is a long-lasting one or consists of similar small operationsThe process is limited to ad-hoc or exploratory testingTests should be run for every build of the applicationCustomer’s requirements (related to existing features) change oftentimesTest cases are tedious and take a lot of time and resources to be executedIt’s one-time testingLoad or stress testing is carried out  Striking a balance Manual testing is still meaningful in the QA process. That said, in many cases, it is no longer enough.

To speak generally, conducting manual testing takes physical time and effort, that’s why it can be extremely wasteful for continuous testing.

Meanwhile, test automation increases the speed of testing and saves resources. It reduces the number of tests that have to be run manually (for example, checks of multilingual sites) but does not eliminate it altogether. Though, while increasing overall test coverage, more time will be needed for maintaining test scripts.

A flawless test automation solution should be easily maintained. Even if you have about 5,000 automated tests, there is no need to spend roughly 5,000 hours to make it work.

Certain cases simply don’t mesh themselves well to automation.

UI testing. When conducting the display checks, manual testing will show how well your UI is in accordance with end-user preference, will provide a close connection with consumers, and help understand the problem on an emotional level.UX usability tests. They provide the answer from the consumer perspective if the application is easy to use or not.Exploratory testing. It is defined as a type of checking where QA engineers test the application, discover, investigate it on the wing, but test cases are not created beforehand. It’s perfect if you can build an optimal duet of manual testing and test automation: when they do not diminish the value of each other – instead, perform testing in close cooperation.

Let us focus on some cases of such a successful “teamwork”: You have an aim to accelerate the test results and release the new version of the product on the market.Manual tests start where test automation ends.There’s a large volume of regression testing, and the software product is launching frequently.You involve both automation and manual checks to test different aspects of the same functionality.Tests are “semi-automatic” and involve some part of manual intervention in order to proceed to the next set of automated tests (e.g., it’s an online store, and the purchase can be made by certain customers, which can be proved only with the help of manual intervention). According to DZone’s 2019 Guide to automated testing, the shift left model is still growing in strength if to speak about automated testing.

Comparing with the results achieved in 2018, the number of respondents who begin automatically testing software at the development stage has grown by 12%. The number of the interviewed who begin automating at the QA stage has decreased by 9%.

What concerns manual testing, this is a little shift left: contrasting this year with the previous one, the percentage of IT professionals surveyed who begin manually testing software at the development stage has decreased by 2 points. The number of respondents who do it at the testing stage has increased by 4%.

According to DZone’s 2019 Guide to automated testing What to automate and where to go the “manual” route? Let us define three main factors that should be considered in this case.

FactorAnswer the questionROI (return on investment)Do the resources spent on automating a specific scenario worth the profit derived from it?Test complexityCan it be automated? Does it make more sense to leave the test as a manual one?System stabilityAt what level are the application and its parts stable? Can it be covered by automated tests? Where manual testers should intervene due to the frequently changing functionality? Clear and visible intent of test automation If conducted accurately, test automation can be quite lucrative. We will discuss the advantages that can be reached from automated testing a little after, but now we don’t want to miss the other side of the coin when test automation just won’t fit well into your project.

What are these traps one needs to consider? The amount of new regression defects is slightly reduced comparing with those detected in the new functionality.Implementation of automation is not a one-off effort, as you need to spend time to keep the automated checks relevant and get the most leverage from them.Sometimes the results of testing are needed in a matter of hours, especially speaking about the checks of the newly introduced features. In this case, it can be more convenient for the project to move to manual testing and get the results ready ASAP. However, there is no secret that the benefits of automated testing delivered to the project are clear and substantive. Let’s name some of them.

Test automation advantagesDescriptionHuge ROIDespite the fact it takes some resources to write test cases, the ROI of this approach for wide-ranging and long-lasting projects can be enormous. This can be attributed to the ease-of-use of automated tests: they are adjustable, have a reusable nature, and can be applied in various ways.
By implementing automation, one can dramatically reduce the cost of each test hour and find more hard-to-detect bugs.Quick feedback on application healthAutomation can give fast feedback concerning the state of the software product since it is revamped and assure higher efficiency of the dev team. It improves close integration between QA engineers, coders, managers, and more.Earlier software defects detectionAs test automation helps augment the entire development speed, it becomes more cost-effective and much easier to identify the glitch and fix it in the early SDLC phase.Time savingsAutomation of regression tests saves the time of the QA engineers to let them focus more on performing ad hoc testing and other testing activities. Furthermore, if involved properly, automated tests can be run with minimum or no human supervision.Test data securityThe effectiveness of checks highly depends on the quality of the used test data.
Creating it manually is very resource-intensive, so testing is often conducted on copies of live databases.
Automated tests can be designed so that they create and receive necessary data, change them without affecting other data, and return to the initial state.Fast speed of checks executionTest automation passes various steps quicker than a human does. This is particularly relevant for DDT (data-driven testing), as the same checks are conducted numerous times but with different data sets. Test automation is the optimal way to fulfill multiple QA goals with effective resources and time.

It can be probably considered essential for organizations who strive to deliver outstanding software products and stay competitive in the industry.

Connect with us to build a result-oriented automation strategy for your business needs.

Share this: More Posts 24 February 2026, by a1qa 5 min read QA for cybersecurity resilience Discover how embedding QA into your CI/CD pipeline reduces risk, ensures compliance, and strengthens resilience by turning security requirements into repeatable tests and release gates in the AI era. Cybersecurity testing Test automation 13 February 2026, by a1qa 6 min read ROI and TCO in QA: How testing helps companies earn more and spend less Learn how to quantify the true business value of testing and align your quality strategy with the bottom-line goals that matter to the C-suite. Quality assurance Test automation 19 January 2026, by a1qa 4 min read Advancing QA and software testing processes with AI Uncovering the benefits companies gain when revolutionizing QA practices with the help of AI and tips to implement it. QA in eHealth Quality assurance Software lifecycle QA Test automation 28 November 2025, by a1qa 6 min read Embarking on the journey ahead: QA trend playbook for 2026 Dive into the wave of QA advancements preparing to take center stage in 2026, arming yourself with the foresight you need to navigate any challenges with confidence.  Blockchain app testing QA trends Quality assurance Test automation 15 October 2025, by a1qa 3 min read 5 signs you need test automation When manual checks throttle delivery, speed and quality both suffer. If time to market is stretching and incidents keep coming, these five signals say automate now. Quality assurance Test automation 30 September 2025, by a1qa 4 min read eLearning with AI elements: a practical testing strategy leaders can trust AI lifts learning outcomes and engagement, but it also raises risk. Here is a clear, business-first testing strategy that helps leaders release reliable AI-powered eLearning, adapt it to local needs, and prove value quickly. Quality assurance Test automation 11 September 2025, by a1qa 5 min read 7 reasons why businesses need load testing  Want to optimize software performance or ensure its smooth functioning during peak sales season? Discover how load testing may help. Performance testing Quality assurance Test automation 27 August 2025, by a1qa 3 min read Shift left in retail: how QA automation speeds up releases and improves eCommerce product quality eCommerce leaders on platforms like Magento and Shopify face intense pressure to deploy new features quickly without sacrificing quality. Discover how a shift-left testing approach – supported by QA automation – helps retail teams release faster and deliver superior product quality. Test automation 14 August 2025, by a1qa 4 min read Output-based test automation, who gains the most? Linking payment to clear testing deliverables sounds simple. Yet the model reshapes budgets, incentives, and release velocity. Here is how output-based engagement works, where it excels. Quality assurance Test automation Related posts Get in touch Name Please fill in the required field. Email Email address seems invalid. Company Phone Project description Please fill in the required field. I hereby give my consent for a1qa and its affiliates to process my personal data in accordance with Privacy Notice for the purpose of handling my request and responding to it. I am aware of the fact that I have the right to withdraw my consent at any time. Please accept the terms to proceed. Add an attachment This file is too large Up to 5 attachments. File must be less than 5 MB.
Allowed types: jpg, jpeg, png, svg, pptx, pdf, doc, docx, ppt, odt File input 1 File input 2 File input 3 File input 4 File input 5 Send a message Thank you! Thank you for reaching out! We’ll get back to you shortly. Close We use cookies on our website to improve its functionality and to enhance your user experience. We also use cookies for analytics. If you continue to browse this website, we will assume you agree that we can place cookies on your device. For more details, please read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. Accept United States
160 Clairemont Ave, Suite 200, Decatur, GA 30030
+1 720 207 5122

United Kingdom
3rd Floor, 5-8 Dysart Street, Moorgate House, London, EC2A 2BX
+44 204 525 7620

Subscribe to news Subscribe to news Full name Please fill in the required field. Company Please fill in the required field. Email Email address seems invalid. I would like to subscribe to a1qa’s newsletter and other marketing communication. By clicking this checkbox, I give my consent for a1qa and its affiliates to process my personal data in accordance with the Privacy Notice.

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the button "Unsubscribe" at the bottom of every email. Please accept the terms to proceed. Subscribe Thank you! Thank you for reaching out! We’ll get back to you shortly. Close Follow us © a1qa software testing company, 2026. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy Quality

智能索引记录